Date added:September 19, 2017Download -1.1MB
When Typhoon Haiyan hit the Philippines in 2013, a number of national and local government tools, platforms and mechanisms were put in place to support the coordination of national government efforts to respond to the disaster. Many of them are web-based and accessible to the public. Some are specific to disaster risk reduction, while others are more general.
This research assesses these tools, platforms and mechanisms in terms of how well they supported - and continue to support - the accountability and transparency of government interventions during disaster responses in the Philippines. It also looks at how these accountability can be further enhanced and replicated vertically and horizontally to help ensure that accountability and transparency are observed principles during all disaster responses.
The report highlights how disempowered affected communities felt during and after Haiyan, because of the lack of a strong accountability mechanism that would enable them to communicate and assert their needs. Consequently, their participation and ‘voice’ in the crafting of accountability tools, platforms and mechanisms used were minimal, if not completely absent.
The authors recommend that the Philippines creates an 'accountability during disasters' framework that will allow government and non-government agencies to apply the necessary revisions in current policies that will improve the delivery of their services during and after future disaster events. It is important for the national Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) agencies to involve local government units, community leaders and community-based DRRM organisations in the development of this framework, to ensure that communities’ voices are heard and integrated into this.
Specifically, the authors call for amendments to the Republic Act 10121 (which provides the legal basis and mandate for local government accountability pertaining to disaster risk reduction). The authors' recommendations suggest that the Act's implementing rules and regulations should include:
- a clear definition of what accountability to disaster-affected population is
- concrete mechanisms to ensure accountability to disaster-affected communities at various levels
- details of who will implement the checks and balances of all humanitarian agencies and actors providing disaster relief and services to affected populations.
About this publication
Publication type Research report
Page length32 pages
Keywordsdisaster risk reduction, transparencyDownload -1.1MB
Country The Philippines
PROJECT |July 12, 2016
Tools and platforms supporting accountability during emergencies in the Philippines
PROJECT |March 29, 2016
Resilience and response to natural disasters in the Philippines
PROJECT |October 9, 2015
Balangay: an information system to prepare and respond to disaster
PROJECT |May 15, 2017
A village-based disaster risk reduction and management hub
PUBLICATION |September 30, 2016
Building disaster-resilient communities
More on these themes
PUBLICATION |January 12, 2018
The Free State Housing Campaign: supporting people-led demands for social…
PUBLICATION |January 9, 2018
Poverty, voice and advocacy: a Haitian study
BLOG |November 21, 2017
Class divisions in technology access
PUBLICATION |November 20, 2017
Izolo: mobile diaries of the less connected
PUBLICATION |November 16, 2017
The techno-centric gaze: incorporating citizen participation technologies into participatory governance…