Date added:October 6, 2014Download -1.2MB
This paper sheds light on existing evidence about the Random Controlled Trials (RCTs) in the evaluation of social accountability tools in service delivery.
It asks where and under what conditions might RCTs be the most appropriate approach. What other evaluation approaches would be more effective and more robust, given the particular characteristics of transparency & accountability programmes?
To date, there have been relatively few impact evaluations for transparency and accountability programmes, despite the amount of donor funding and attention given to the field.
Evaluations tend either to be concentrated in certain sectors and countries or are in very early stages themselves and therefore it is too soon for lessons to be drawn. For technology-based initiatives the pool of evaluations is even smaller, reflecting the relative youth of these kinds of interventions.
This research report addresses the following questions:
- What should impact evaluations be measuring in the context of T&A?
- What do we know about RCTs and other experimental approaches in evaluating T&A initiatives?
- How do RCTs measure the impact of T&A programmes?
- What can RCTs tell us about the effectiveness/success of T&A initiatives?
- What are the most appropriate ways to measure impact in T&A?
About this publication
Publication type Research report
Page length37 pages
KeywordsRandom Controlled Trials, RCT, service delivery, social accountability, transparency and accountability initiativesDownload -1.2MB
More on these themes
PUBLICATION |January 21, 2018
Appropriating technology for accountability: messages from Making All Voices Count
PUBLICATION |January 20, 2018
Supporting innovation and the use of technologies in accountability initiatives:…
PUBLICATION |January 19, 2018
Increasing citizen voice and government responsiveness: what does success really…
BLOG |January 17, 2018
Cleaning house — Experimental evidence on improving citizen engagement in…
PUBLICATION |January 17, 2018
The effect of civic leadership training on citizen engagement and…
PUBLICATION |January 15, 2018
The art of ‘bureaucraft’: Why and how bureaucrats respond to…
PUBLICATION |January 12, 2018
The Free State Housing Campaign: supporting people-led demands for social…
PUBLICATION |January 9, 2018
Poverty, voice and advocacy: a Haitian study
PUBLICATION |December 15, 2017
Addressing failure in ICT-enabled ‘citizen voice – government responsiveness’ interventions:…
BLOG |December 13, 2017
Supporting local learning and adaptation – Unpacking the effectiveness of…