Date added:January 15, 2018Download -516KB
Despite the recent increase of empirical research and conceptual development in transparency and accountability, much of this has been on the side of citizen action, looking at why and how citizens mobilise around accountability demands and at what makes their actions successful. Comparatively, there has been much less work exploring the state side of the equation – to explain why and how public officials respond (or not) to citizen demands for accountability.
There are a series of reasons why our understanding of responsiveness is limited, namely: the difficulty of clarifying which factors, among the multitude that shape bureaucratic behaviour, are likely to dominate in certain contexts; the lack of resources and accessibility when conducting systematic research into bureaucracies and their responsiveness; the difficulty of separating capacity and willingness when looking at bureaucrats’ responsiveness.
The aim of this research briefing is to highlight some of the more prominent issues related to bureaucratic responsiveness, particularly in relation to a ‘willingness to respond’. The authors review the relevant literature on public sector responsiveness, and use a set of interviews with ‘reformists’ within government to make three contributions.
First, they present a simple framework for thinking about the conflicting pressures that public officials face in their work which shape how likely they are to respond to citizens’ demands.
Second, the paper argues that the way that public officials see citizens and their claims (in terms of legitimacy, credibility and level of trust) directly influences their willingness to respond to citizen claims.
Finally, the authors show that if and when public officials are willing to respond to citizens, they make use of their political and social capital to devise a series of strategies to mobilise responsiveness within the state through what we call bureaucraft: the art of manoeuvring diplomatically within complex organisational and individual incentives that pervade state bureaucracies – in other words, the bureaucratic equivalent of statecraft.Download -516KB
About this publication
Publication type Research summary
Page length10 pagesDownload -516KB
PROJECT |August 24, 2016
Understanding government reactions to transparency and accountability demands
More on these themes
NEWS |November 16, 2017
MOPA: How an app generates data that help clean-up Maputo
NEWS |November 3, 2017
Balangay wins People’s Award at Global Innovation Week 2017
NEWS |October 18, 2017
Game My Village: Improving and inspiring village participatory planning in…
BLOG |September 21, 2017
Frei Sangil: The social innovator behind Balangay in the Philippines
BLOG |September 21, 2017
Why development needs innovation scouts
BLOG |May 22, 2017
Open Cities: Firefighting at your fingertips in Indonesia
PROJECT |May 11, 2017
Tushirikiane project: Following up on election promises to improve service…
PUBLICATION |May 10, 2017
One step to a thousand miles: building accountability in Liberia
BLOG |March 8, 2017
Rating post-rape services as a tool for accountability to rape…