Political language and political action: An OGP lesson for South Africa
A few days ago, Gabriella Razzano from the Open Democracy Advice Centre in South Africa shared her thoughts and reflections on the Open Government Partnership and ODAC's project with Making All Voices Count.
At ODAC, we believe in reflecting and learning – not just in relation to the broader environment, but also in relation to our own work. And following on from the eventful SONA2017, and continuing domestic and international discussions on “political truth”, now is an apt time to reflect on one of our most recent (and simple) learning’s in relation to our Making All Voices Count project on the Open Government Partnership (OGP): South African politics in this year of internal electioneering will mean civil society should rethink its approach to participating in the OGP.
The current broader political climate does not of course detract from how vital the fight for transparency and good governance is. ODAC believes that the OGP is still a vital platform for leveraging these goals in South Africa. What we are reconsidering, however, is how we approach it. ODAC have championed the OGP since its inception in 2011. But difficulties we experienced in implementing a Making All Voices Count project on the issue last year has very real lessons for us all.
The idea behind the project was fairly simple: the OGP can help civil society forward their existing work on transparency, therefore getting civil society engaged on the OGP will lead to better collaboration with government, and better transparency outcomes. In our monitoring and evaluation framework though, we noted that a fundamental assumption was that OGP was not just a “talk shop”. Yet, we have struggled to maintain interest in the OGP from a broader group. As a colleague from civil society of mine poignantly pointed out when we were discussing how to get civil society more involved in the OGP in South Africa:
Civil society cannot maintain enthusiasm in a process when it appears there is all talk, and no action. The political talk around the OGP, while always positive in tone from government, does not seem to be accompanied by strong action and outcomes. Civil society partners then can’t bring themselves to commit to a process that won’t take forward the core of their work. One is reminded of George Orwell’s words on political language: “Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable and to give an appearance of solidarity to pure wind”.
But the truth is that there have definitely been examples of collaborations between civil society and government on specific OGP commitments in South Africa that can be viewed as successful (the partnership between Code for South Africa and National Treasury on “Municipal Money” project comes to mind).
So we know broader civil society are not getting invested because political language clouds inaction. Yet, some groups are seeing collaboration on OGP working – what’s the difference? Our research on government coordination on OGP(again a result of support from Making All Voices Count and the Institute of Development Studies) holds a very succinct answer: coordination will only happen when there is a direct benefit to both parties to coordinate, or otherwise its just extra work.
Government and civil society will coordinate on OGP projects, when those projects are not just a talking opportunity, but they instead take forward real transparency agendas for all those concerned. We should not be distracted by empty political rhetoric, but instead seek out the many partners within government taking action on transparency, in alignment with the OGP, in very real ways. We just need to rethink our approach. After all, another very quotable thinker Plato noted it best: “One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors”.
The article was originally posted here.
About the authorGabriella Razzano is the Head of Research at the Open Democracy Advice Centre. She has a particular focus on access to information and freedom of expression issues, and has served as an active member of the Right2Know Campaign.
BLOG |November 9, 2016
Connecting the dots: pushing forward the implementation of OGP commitments
PUBLICATION |October 6, 2016
Connecting the dots: The coordination challenge for the Open Government…
PROJECT |June 20, 2016
Cooperation: the vital missing ingredient in the government open data…
PROJECT |May 13, 2016
Opening up 'Open Governance' in South Africa
More on these themes
PUBLICATION |January 12, 2018
The Free State Housing Campaign: supporting people-led demands for social…
BLOG |December 13, 2017
Supporting local learning and adaptation – Unpacking the effectiveness of…
PUBLICATION |December 6, 2017
Learning to Make All Voices Count: Lessons for OGP, donors,…
PUBLICATION |November 22, 2017
Learning to make all voices count: Lessons and reflections on…
PUBLICATION |September 29, 2017
Innovations to engage youth in accountability work in Liberia
BLOG |September 28, 2017
Czarina Medina-Guce: The social innovator proving that #opengov works
PUBLICATION |August 7, 2017
Pathways to accountability from the margins: reflections on participatory video…
BLOG |July 6, 2017
Learning to make the political personal, and other lessons from…