Date added: February 22, 2017Download - 992KB
This report highlights the ideas and practices that underlie the work of crowdsourcing intermediaries: actors who collect and analyse citizen feedback using digital platforms, and use it to support positive change. Most studies of crowdsourcing initiatives in the transparency and accountability field are primarily concerned with representation (whose voice is being heard?) and impact (what kind of change is being supported?). By contrast, this study shifts the spotlight onto crowdsourcing intermediaries themselves, their motives, and their theories of change and action.
The research used an original conceptual framework that combines ideas from the governance and social accountability fields with networked gatekeeping theory. According to this framework, crowdsourcing intermediaries are gatekeepers of citizen voice who can shape and therefore control many different aspects of the flow of information generated by contributors.
The picture that emerges from the research, which combined content analysis of website text with qualitative case studies, reveals a great deal of fluidity and experimentation in the way that crowdsourcing is defined and used as part of the political strategies of crowdsourcing intermediaries. Equally varied were the roles and relationships that crowdsourcing intermediaries engaged in as collectors and analysts of citizen feedback.
A key finding is that in crowdsourcing initiatives, it is difficult to distinguish between the interpretive aspects of intermediation, which comprise the collection and analysis of citizen feedback, and political aspects of intermediation, which involve using the collected information to support positive change. Put more simply, crowdsourced information is inherently political.
Key themes in this paper are:
- the role of crowdsourcing intermediaries as gatekeepers of citizen-generated data
- the accountability of crowdsourcing intermediaries to citizens who contribute data, especially in terms of data policies
- the factors that influence the pathways of individual crowdsourcing intermediaries.
About this publication
Publication type Research report
Publication year 2017
Page length 32 pages
Keywords data ethics, transparency and accountability initiativesDownload - 992KB
Theme Citizen engagement and voice Citizen-generated data Civil society monitoring Crowdsourcing Infomediaries Intermediaries Online crowdsourcing platforms Technologies for transparency and accountability
More on these themes
BLOG | March 21, 2017
Citizen-generated data in the information ecosystem
BLOG | March 8, 2017
Rating post-rape services as a tool for accountability to rape…
BLOG | March 7, 2017
Learning to Make All Voices Count: Pursuing openness through iterative…
PUBLICATION | March 2, 2017
Building an ecosystem around data: using interactive radio for accountability…
PROJECT | March 1, 2017
The diffusion and adaptation of participatory budgeting
BLOG | February 28, 2017
Technology and transformed governance in Indonesia
PROJECT | February 23, 2017
Including the socially excluded in Ghana's social protection programmes
BLOG | February 7, 2017
Let's get vertical
PROJECT | February 6, 2017
Monitoring government development projects at local level
PROJECT | February 2, 2017
Map Kibera: Learning from six years of digital citizen engagement